Some new articles are kind of gross and make no sense. I was patrolling recent changes today and I saw the article Get Your Cat to Sit by You when You Study. It talked about eating fish guts to attract your cat. I felt it was gross, but there was no gross category in the deletion policy, so I marked it as acc(accuracy) instead. Can we have a gross(gro) nfd category?
Not too sure if we need a “gross” NFD reason. For this particular article, and other similar ones, nfd|jok is more appropriate since I highly doubt it’s meant to be taken seriously
Hailey
3
We have the speedy tag if it is completely bad already. It doesn’t always get tagged for speedy though, so I think it can be tagged for accuracy too.
nfd|sar (sarcastic) can be used too if the author meant to be. This NFD wouldn’t be needed.
I really don’t see a need for this reason, because “grossness” is relative. What is gross to you might not be gross for me, or vice versa. For example, if we have an article on “How to Prepare Liver”, should we delete it as gross just because some people can’t bear the thought of eating liver? (I happen to be one of those, but anyway…)
