1

when i was patroling articles, i had bumped into this article http://www.wikihow.com/Look-Fake-and-Act-Slutty-(Teen-Girls) i think that it should be agumented whether for it to be deleted, it is a how to on how to look and act slutty and racy, i think that it is inappropert and should not be on here. i understand of this being a how to wiki for everthing and everything but i think that anything encouraging sexual behaviors, especially for younger girls when they read this artical. i dont know. any thoughts about it.

2

Which is why we have the NFD criteria for sexually charged content - I agree with the deletion. I would have also, in addition to being sexually charged, tagged it as being sarcastic. Good call on tagging the article for deletion.

3

Either it’s a wrong link, or the article mentioned here was already deleted …

4

It’s not a wrong link; the link is just messed up and part of the article’s title is cut off from the link that you’re able to click on, causing the link to lead to a non-existent article unless you copy the whole thing manually. Here’s a working link to the article: Look Fake and Act Slutty (Teen Girls)

5

@Lugia2453 I’m really curious as to how the “sexually charged content” deletion criteria apply to this article. The article is not focused on sex whatsoever; in fact, sex is never mentioned or implied in the article—it’s mostly about trying to look sexy. We have lots of articles focused on trying to look sexy, be hot, etc., even one called “How to Be Slutty,” so how is this one different? I’m not defending the article, but I am trying to understand how the policy applies to this article, and I don’t see it.

6

Good point, actually. It’s still sarcastic, though, so I’ll go ahead and change the NFD reason to that.

7

@Laura7491 If you don’t have a complete link, copy and paste the link using your mouse into your URL bar from the address shown there: I’ll set up a corrected link here. wikihow.com/Look-Fake-and-Act-Slutty-(Teen-Girls)

8

@Byankno1 thanks! your link worked! This article def. needs to go. A “sarcastic” reason looks fine, but also a “jok” would work. But this article has no value whichever corner you look at it.

9

I don’t think it should be deleted for sex or sarcastic, but as duplicates to http://www.wikihow.com/Look-Plastic-and-Fake and http://www.wikihow.com/Act-Sexy