I recently have been noticing that most articles that I look at are low quality, nfd qualifying, or speedy. Most articles have horrible explaination. Can usersthat are writing have written a bunch of speedy or nfd articles have to send their articles to a admin before they can publish their article. When they try to publish, there article is sent to a booster boosting and sees if it is fixable, or downright gibbreish. It can be rejected or accepted. This would create a lot less work for people that constantly have to expand articles.
system
2
But, that also requires a lot of time for boosters and admins. So far, I’m kind of *meh-y* about it…
Zack
3
This problem is not new to wikiHow. We have had poor submissions since before I started. The current process is a good one if everyone does their part. Admins are not the only janitors. Cleanup is for everyone.
system
4
Throwing articles at the admins makes more unnecessary work - we’re all volunteer editors… no matter what the titles are. I agree with Pastor Zack.
Oliver
5
That’s essentially the idea of boosting.
