While patrolling recent changes, I noticed that there are some articles that claim their videos do not work. http://www.wikihow.com/Image:Video_No_Work_1_105.png
At first, I thought it was just vandalism, but looking in the editor, there seems to be no sign of the message. http://www.wikihow.com/Image:Video_No_Work_2_578.png
I’m fairly certain this is not intentional. I’m also fairly certain that this isn’t something we want on wikiHow.
All I can say, is that, even though I embedded the video last night, I did NOT write the additional comment for below the video. I know enough not to say anything like that there. The video may be a little poorly videoed, but it gets the point across of how to solve the puzzle. Other editors came along and added that comment to the article. Since I don’t see the edit you’re questioning, I can either tell you to roll it back, or some how remove the comment.
^ The strange thing is, that text does not appear on the editing page of the article. It shows only {{Video:Blah Template Yay}}. It appears in more articles than just that one. EDIT: It has mysteriously vanished. I suppose that’s good.
system
4
Could it be elaborated on how the edit was presented, but there is no raw history notation in either the article nor the video page itself? Because as far as I’m concerned since this post, the article has not been touched since the 18th (when the video was inserted) and there are no revisions on the video page itself aside from the video upload. So how could you “see” in RC when the video insertion edit was patrolled an hour later that day, while your image upload was taken around 21 hours afterwards?
