It’s a team just for patrolling RC, QC and Video Adder. I know this idea will get rejected but It has a chance!
system
2
You, sir, are interfering with ORCA’s job. All of those who oppose ORCA will be terminated… Just kidding. You may want to join my group, however.
Yup, it’s going to get rejected, even though I want you to go strong with it. You’re probably going to get some comments from admins like “Do we need to have a team for EVERY thing we do?” *laughs* or you’ll get a lovely comment rejecting it in the “nicest” way possible apparently. *coughs* And then guess what I’ll get?!?!?! Something along the lines of “Actually, that’s not true” *laughs again* and then they’ll go on and on.
system
4
After you argue with them about the plan, you will become (magically) an antagonistic, foolish, vengeful, and trollish bad faith contributor! Speaking of magic, this thread is going to be closed right after my comment…
system
5
Well. 'Kay. @JKL1234
, if you’d like to make a team that focuses on these new tools, go ahead. When the numbers are high, there’s no problem with getting some people to help out
Why do people have to shun every idea for a team that comes up? (Yes, I am talking to you @ConnorFleming
and @TheMartian
) @JKL1234
, if you want to make a team, go ahead. Just be aware of the drawbacks you may face.
Huh? If anything at all, I am supporting the team. Otherwise, what would my whole thread about “Being Scared To Share Your Ideas” be about?
Oh, I am considered a troll. (I hope they have me on their “list”).
Yes projects get rejected by admins because we have so many that are just not used anymore and are left. But if you feel very strong about this go ahead, but has AndrewG1999 you probably will face some drawbacks. Good Luck!
Yes, but the way people reject teams is the most stupid thing I have ever seen. (I am sorry, but it is). Admin or not, you shouldn’t be rude when rejecting teams.
Well everyone has their ways of saying things. I’m just stating the facts but encouraging his ideas.
I don’t think anyone has rejected anything. Saying “this won’t work” isn’t the same as rejection IMHO. As someone who has been around for 5+ years, I’ve seen a lot of teams fail and am wary about any new projects. I don’t want someone coming in with high expectations and then getting really disappointed if their project doesn’t work and I’m sure that other wikiHowians have expressed their concerns for similar reasons. I feel that when I relate what has happened with projects, I’m not listened to or people just tell me that won’t happen to their project. So, I think this goes both ways.
IamSH
13
Hey I just want to say you all that why we need so much team to do a single work. For RC, we have RC patrol, which is maintained by RC patroller team. QC is also patrolled by RC patrol. For video patrolling, it can be either done through QC or there is also another way to patrol which is stated in this article www.wikihow.com/Patrol-Videos-on-wikiHow
created by Krystle. You may realise that all these things are patrolled through RC patrol app and indirectly by RC patroller team. Please there is nothing in wikiHow is wrong. But in wikiHow we have to stay far from duplicate either it may be article or team.
system
14
you might as well call this the forum for arguing im not trying to be rude or anything but use this properly or just shut the hell up for crying out loud your like a load of preschool children stop shunning,shouting and repeating everthing everybody else has said if you agree just put “i agree” simple yes
If we said “I agree” to everything, then Wikihow would be a horrible place. P.S. That was rude
Please be nice. They are debating about a team, it’s not like they’re arguing for no reason.
JKL1234 or an admin please move this to the Collaboration Corner.
system
19
well i apologise for being rude but when looking at it at the time your actions did seem a little bit childish just post a suggestion and leave it at that yes its so simple i dont see why you can’t just do it!
