Should this be a valid “excuse” to delete an article if the topic is simple logic, et cetera? (or does {{nfd|not}} suffice?) http://www.wikihow.com/Open-the-Pictures-Folder
http://www.wikihow.com/Talk-with-a-Husky-Voice
What’s unnecessary for you, may be necessary for others. Some people who aren’t used to working with a computer might not know where to find the Pictures folder- very realistic possibility. Same with the voice thing. Not everyone knows how to make your voice change in such a way. Just because something is “simple logic” for you, doesn’t make it simple for other people.
OoT2D
3
You should go with the advice above, @JirachiQueen
. Not all people are the same. It’s not like everyone has Einstein level intelligence. Some people just don’t know how to do certain things, so that’s why wikiHow was created. Follow me? Don’t worry; I once thought along the same lines.
system
4
I don’t think you’d need any new NFD reason… “not” or “incomplete” would work fine.
Eh, yes. That was basically what I was going for with my post. But without suggesting an alternative nfd reason because there was no real reason to nfd it.
Mmm, alright. Thanks for the feedback and the reminder why I should not share my ideas without thinking them more thoroughly through…
*cold sweat*
If it’s really, really
simple logic or something stupid that nobody would ever possibly, in any universe practically need (like How to Move Your Arm, or How to Continue Breathing), then I think the article can usually be tagged as a joke.
@AndrewG1999
Cool. That’s along the lines of what I was referring to.
The first one doesn’t help. You can’t open pictures in Explorer. Maybe they mean Windows?
The second one is actually a great topic, but it needs a major makeover. We should edit that one to where it’s awesome.
@Darkfrost
Thank you! Soo glad you are willing to help out!
