1

I’m pretty sure that this issue was fixed for regular inuse tags, since I haven’t seen any spellchecker edits to articles with inuse tags lately. However, this does not appear to be the case with staffinuse templates. I noticed this edit , where the spellcheker was used to fix a spelling error on a staff inuse article. The edit is not the fault of the user who made it, since the spellcheker does not show templates, but it is instead the fault of the tool.

I’m not sure if this is an issue or not with staff articles, but I thought that I’d report it just in case.

5 Likes
2

Ah yes, it seems they don’t go into some tools, but are still going into spellcheck. I’ll see if Gaurang can update:slight_smile:

1 Like
3

And this has been updated, so the next pull will make sure no staff inuse articles go into the spellchecker tool. Thanks R2:slight_smile:

1 Like