Hey wikiHowians,

I want to share an important update about our licensing policies and how we’re evolving to protect the content we create together.

BackgroundWhen we started wikiHow in 2005, the internet was drastically different from what we all interact with now. In some ways, that version of the web feels almost unrecognizable relative to the modern internet and the nature of content creation today. Despite these changes, wikiHow has taken pride in being a place that continues to emphasize high-quality content produced by real people with real experience looking to help others. With the help of this community, we have ridden and survived the waves of those changing times in a way that, we feel, is true to the wikiHow ethos. Unfortunately, in this changed internet, AI, large companies, and other actors have stolen and misused wikiHow’s content. We have all put 20 years of hard work into making wikiHow the resource it is today — we know it as a place that helps people in real, meaningful ways, whether its how to have your first kiss, how to change the oil in your car, how to be a more empathetic friend, and many other ways (hundreds of thousands, in fact). Yet for some of these external parties, all that work is merely reduced to a collection of tokens for their model’s usage without credit to the incredible community that’s been built here over the decades. Frustratingly, these models and companies are not only blatantly violating our Terms of Use and IP rights for all non-user content, but even for user content they’re violating the requirements of the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Creative Commons license by using it for commercial purposes and not providing appropriate attribution.

After lots of thoughtful discussion, we have concluded that the Creative Commons License is no longer serving its initial, intended purpose in today’s internet. What made sense in 2005 simply doesn’t align with the realities of the modern web.

What’s Happening?As a result, wikiHow will be removing the Creative Commons licensing entirely from its platform. Since it only applies to user-created content, it wasn’t applicable to a large portion of the site anyway, but to avoid confusion it will be removed completely. As a result, no new user-created content will be available for reuse outside of wikiHow under the conditions of the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Creative Commons license. This means that while you and other contributors still own your work, others can’t use it outside of wikiHow without gaining explicit permission from you. To reiterate: you will still continue to own the copyright of the content you provide.

We will begin implementing this change immediately, but it may take a little time before it’s rolled out completely to all relevant pages and processes, so please bear with us.

How This Affects UsFor the community, nothing will change in how we collaborate and improve both articles and the site itself. Really, this is just impacting external usage of user-submitted content. The User Content License Grants in our Terms of Use are mostly the same — you will still grant the same license to wikiHow when you submit content and you will still grant a license to other users that allows them to modify and adapt the content. The key change is that ability will be limited to within wikiHow and this user content won’t be licensed out for non-commercial use with attribution externally via CC. As was the case even before this change, content created by wikiHow Staff remains owned by wikiHow and is not licensed out.

We know this may feel like a big shift, so we appreciate your understanding as we navigate these new frontiers to keep us around for the next 20 years!

16 Likes

Are contributions made prior to 2025-03-24 still licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0?

@Xeverything11 Yes, that’s correct:slight_smile:

Regarding this license change, I have updated the wikiHowL policy to only allow articles last updated prior to 2025-03-24.

wikiHowL is a Miraheze wiki about joke how-to articles, which are all licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. (not to be confused with regular wikiHow)

1 Like

Sorry for the bump. I have an inquiry related to this.

A few years ago I created a template https://wikihow.com/Template:Creativecommons that users could use on their user pages to specify the terms of the license to apply to their content.

I wonder if we can maybe expand this so it can maybe be added to the bottoms of article pages so users who want to continue licensing their content under CC can continue to do so. I appreciate that more freedom and control is being granted to users to ensure compliance with the terms.

Maybe a software feature could allow the user to select a license to release the content on when submitting, similar to files. For some users, a Creative Commons license is beneficial.

I can see why the change was made. wikiHow has struggled over the past seven to eight years with scrapers ripping off content. From wikiHow memes to bad-faith reposting, contributors do not get adequate credit for their contributions. With user content often hand generated and heavily valued, I can see easily why most would not want to arbitrarily release it under a CC license.

This would also clarify things like if I released things under CC BY-SA, others should be able to see that if they were to edit the content it would also be released under CC BY-SA, and likewise if it is forked.

Update 1: I updated the template with all appropriate Creative Commons parameters as well as mainspace support (but there should be support for a license section in article space).

This sounds great, but what if one user (allowing CC) edits, it’s gets vandalized, and the vandalism is reverted by a user who does NOT allow CC?

Thanks Aasim - it’s an interesting concept, but not something we can apply to articles.

Maybe in the future?

I mean for what is worth not that many editors feel inclined to dual release their contributions. This is probably something that will be a rainy day thing, as I can bet not that many contributors want others to blindly use their work without at the very minimum providing attribution. And nothing is stopping me from reposting my original submissions elsewhere – or letting others do the same.

This licensing change from CC BY-NC-SA to a proprietary license violates the ShareAlike clause of CC BY-NC-SA license.

Why the violation?
In the CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 license deed , under the ShareAlike clause, when someone contributes to a CC BY-NC-SA work, like wikiHow articles last updated before March 24, 2025, they must release the contributions under the same license, CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 or any later version. The quotes describe:

ShareAlike— If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

Your contributions to adaptations of BY-NC-SA 2.0, 2.5 or 3.0 materials may only be licensed under:

  • The license used for the original work, or a later version of that BY-NC-SA license.
  • Ported versions of that BY-NC-SA license, the same or later version as the licensed work.

(These quotes were derived from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.en and https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-considerations/compatible-licenses/ , where both are licensed under CC BY 4.0)

However, our proprietary license (User Content License Grants) is not in the list. Therefore, wikiHow appears to violate the ShareAlike clause of CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 license.

Pinging @JayneG for any thoughts.

Past content can’t be relicensed under the CC BY-NC-SA license. But future submissions can.

Wikinews for example used a different license before 2005 and then changed to CC BY-2.5. More recently they use CC BY-SA 4.0. These licensing changes are not possible retroactively, yes. But for future submissions it is.

I think a lot of the legalese probably could have been avoided if instead we release almost all of the rights to our content to allow wikiHow to copy, share, adapt, and sublicense within and off the site (like now) like is common on social networks, but then wikiHow can separately release content under different licenses. If they want to then change the license it only requires a technical change rather than getting all contributors onboard.

But yes. People have been exploiting wikiHow content for proprietary LLM use. Developing free, downloadable models like is done with Ollama that can be run on one’s own machine are probably non-commercial use, but OpenAI’s GPT or Google’s Gemini is probably not. This is probably why wikiHow felt justified that it was necessary to limit the use of its content to train neural networks; technically under the CC BY-NC-SA license it can only be done for non-commercial such as academic or research purposes, but in practice it has not.

Some other changes make sense, like the limitations on wikiHow mirror sites, because mirror sites may get close to trademark infringement, especially if they copy the same layout, etc.

The reason I was suggesting that a license field be permitted in articles is that social networks allow people to do the same. For example YouTube does this.

The difference is that on YouTube it’s only one name behind the account (usually), whereas here it could be upwards of 1,000,000 names behind one article.

For Wikinews, the licensing change from CC BY 2.5 to CC BY-SA 4.0 was acceptable as it doesn’t require the same license when adapting (no ShareAlike clause) in the former.

I wish I was more clear here. Under the share alike clause, content submitted before March 25, 2025 or whenever cannot be relicensed under a more prohibitive license. CC licenses are irrevocable as long as the person using that content complies with the terms of the license. On the other hand for future submissions the content being submitted is not licensed under the CC license.

I see your point as well. For content licensed under the CC BY-NC-SA license, subsequent edits must also use that sharealike license. That is what templates and whatnot would be for.

Pinging @JayneG for any thoughts (no replies by @JayneG in 5 days yet).

Recapping the fact that this licensing change violated the ShareAlike clause of CC BY-NC-SA license because subsequent edits to CC BY-NC-SA works, like wikiHow articles last updated prior to 2025-03-24, must be licensed under CC BY-NC-SA and not under a more prohibitive license. These wikiHow articles are edited by several editors and, under ShareAlike clause, they prohibits relicensing under a more prohibitive license, without permission from all editors involved.

Thanks for the ping. This isn’t my area of expertise, so I don’t have anything further to add. I’m going to go ahead and close this conversation because I believe it was just meant to be an announcement and I’m not really able to add further information, but if you’d like clarification on these changes, please reach out to privacy@wikihow.com .

2 Likes