A cloaking device is a machine that renders objects in a certain area invisible. Possibly the most famous use is on the Romulan and Klingon ships in Star Trek. Work is being done with metamaterials to try to create an actual cloaking device. This article will teach you how to create a Rochester cloak, which can only cloak an object from a particular direction, but can be built with everyday lenses.
Steps
-
1Collect the lenses. You will need four convex lenses; two (L1 and L4) with a focal length f1, and two (L2 and L3) with a focal length f2. Note that f1 should be larger than f2.
-
2Begin by positioning L1 and L2. They should be a distance t1 apart, where t1 = f1 + f2.Advertisement
-
3Position L3 and L4. They should also be a distance t1 apart.
-
4Position the two lens assemblies. There should be a distance t2 between lenses L2 and L3, and all four lenses should be in a straight line. t2 = 2*f2*t1/(f1-f2)
-
5Position an object between L2 and L3. If you look along the central axis of the lenses, this object should be invisible.
- WARNING: the object itself should not block the central axis (it should have a hole in the middle), or it will not cloak.
-
6Congratulations, you've built a simple cloaking device. The main advantage of this type of cloaking device is that it can be scaled up indefinitely, so long as you can find large enough lenses. The main disadvantages are that the object needs a hole through the centre, and that it can only cloak in a particular direction.
- In experiments, it could cloak an object when viewed up to 15 degrees off the central axis.
Advertisement
Expert Q&A
Ask a Question
200 characters left
Include your email address to get a message when this question is answered.
Submit
Advertisement
Tips
- Bigger lenses = bigger cloaking areaThanks
Advertisement
Warnings
- The lenses can produce some visual artifacts around the edges of the cloaked area. However, this can be resolved with bigger lenses.Thanks
Advertisement
About this article
Thanks to all authors for creating a page that has been read 10,447 times.
Advertisement