As of now, articles that are written below character article standards just disappear when they’re deleted, and they may never be written again. I believe articles that are deleted solelyfor being below character article standards should have their title become a “request” to be answered. This way there’s a chance for that article to be rewritten. What are everyone’s thoughts?

This is a very fair point - perhaps they’d make good article requests, and naturally someone could come along and write it better than the original. Then again, articles with “good” titles are more likely to be revised heavily than deleted, and our request pool is huge as is. I’d be for this suggestion, as long as it is only with articles deleted because they are below wikiHow standards. We wouldn’t want to spawn joke articles, would we?

I agree 100%. @Metsguy234 I believe ISMKW answered your question. Also, after reviewing

I, personally, would be ecstaticif I neversaw a CHA article again!!!

Me too!

Well, there is wikiTutor. But a lot of times it’s whether or not the author wants to be lazy, and not necessarily a lack of grammatical knowledge.

Wouldn’t this go for any deleted article then though?