1

This article was so confusing I couldn’t even edit it enough until I read the middle of it. It keeps mentioning the names of people who work at the wikiHaus and even the author of the article. It needs formatting and cleaning up, but I’m not sure how to edit it, so I tagged it for attention. http://www.wikihow.com/Get-the-Best-Out-of-the-Major-Global-Religions

2

Wow. It’s scary that someone was even able to conjure up such a thing as this article. They must have a lot of free time on their hands.:stuck_out_tongue:

3

Wow! I entirely agree with Cyber Fox! However, just because it is such a long piece of text, I was wondering if it was copied from another site (so therefore a copywrite violation)? Any thoughts? TammySin

4

I did a simple google test and did not find any copyright violations.

5

My opinion? It’s not really a how-to. It doesn’t provide practical and useful instructions on how to achieve or do something: there is no goal or finished product that the article leads you to. It’s more encyclopedic in nature… the Appreciate the core aspects of ____ “steps” don’t include actionable items… they just list those core aspects. I’m not saying it couldn’t be turned into a useful article, but right now? It seems more like a glossary than a how-to article.

6

Step one of method two definitely needs to be broken down. I don’t really understand it either.

7

It seems like something from an encyclopedia.

8

Step one of method one needs to be edited, but I don’t know many editors that are willing to read the whole thing and edit it.

9

It’s been tagged for NFD not a how-to in NAB. I think it can be fixed up, but I’m not sure how. Maybe another user will edit it soon.