1

This article http://www.wikihow.com/Get-Revenge-on-a-Bully seems mean spirited, but I’m not sure if I really should tag the article for. It’s telling people to call bullies bad words, spread rumors, and crack into their passwords.

2

I would tag it probably. that’s just my opinion.:slight_smile:

3

Getting back at a bully might not be a good thing to do - though people shouldn’t be relaxed and sit back against a bully. NFD|acc ? I myself, don’t even know if nfd|mea would really be a good decision to use for this case.

4

Hmm. I guess this is another time for NFD analyzation. {{nfd|acc}} - Probably not. {{nfd|adv}} - Definitely not meant to be an advertisement, so that’s a big no right there. {{nfd|cha}} - I wouldn’t think so. {{nfd|dup}} - Went and searched up for duplicate topics and found that it’s a duplicate of Get Revenge on Anyone . {{nfd|dru}} - No. You don’t focus on drugs when doing this. {{nfd|dan}} - Could be, because of the “Revenge in Person” method. {{nfd|hat}} - Hate/racism could be a reason for this too. {{nfd|ill}} - This can probably get you suspended in schools if you really tried for revenge on the bully, so I could say yes on that one. {{nfd|imp}} - This wasn’t intended to be an impossible task, although if you are shy, this can be hard to do. {{nfd|inc}} - Really? Just no. Incomplete would not fit here. {{nfd|jok}} - You aren’t joking when getting revenge on the bully, so that is a big no too. {{nfd|mea}} - Could also meet this criteria because of the “Revenge in Person” method. This method now meets two pieces of the criteria for deletion. {{nfd|not}} - No. It’s how-to/instructional in nature. {{nfd|pot}} - This does not focus on potty humor at all. {{nfd|sar}} - You don’t use sarcasm when getting revenge on a bully. {{nfd|sex}} - No. This is not even closeto being about sex. {{nfd|van}} - This could apply only to specific schools, but there are a lot of schools around the world, so no, the article does not meet this criteria. There is my NFD analyzation. Anyways, I have nominated the article for deletion as a duplicate of the article I described in the analyzation, which is Get Revenge on Anyone . If you feel that the article deserves more NFD reasons, feel free to add them.

5

It’s not a duplicate because getting anyone revenge is different from just a bully

6

I asked Isorhythmic about the duplicate and he said it’s not necessarily a duplicate. He said that mean spirited, incomplete, and accuracy tags would be better choices.

7

I’d say mean-spirited would probably be the best tag based on the title, but based on the content I’d say incomplete is a good option as well.