PDF download Download Article PDF download Download Article

Traditionally, a radical or irrational number cannot be left in the denominator (the bottom) of a fraction. When a radical does appear in the denominator, you need to multiply the fraction by a term or set of terms that can remove that radical expression. While the use of calculators make rationalizing fractions a bit dated, this technique may still be tested in class.

Part 1
Part 1 of 4:

Rationalizing a Monomial Denominator

PDF download Download Article
  1. A fraction is written correctly when there is no radical in the denominator. If the denominator contains a square root or other radical, you must multiply both the top and bottom by a number that can get rid of that radical. Note that the numerator can contain a radical. Don't worry about the numerator. [1]
    • We can see that there is a in the denominator.
  2. A fraction with a monomial term in the denominator is the easiest to rationalize. Both the top and bottom of the fraction must be multiplied by the same term, because what you are really doing is multiplying by 1.
    Advertisement
  3. The fraction has now been rationalized. [2]
  4. Advertisement
Part 2
Part 2 of 4:

Rationalizing a Binomial Denominator

PDF download Download Article
  1. 1
    Examine the fraction. If your fraction contains a sum of two terms in the denominator, at least one of which is irrational, then you cannot multiply the fraction by it in the numerator and denominator. [3]
    • To see why this is the case, write an arbitrary fraction where and are irrational. Then the expression contains a cross-term If at least one of and is irrational, then the cross-term will contain a radical.
    • Let's see how this works with our example.
    • As you can see, there's no way we can get rid of the in the denominator after doing this.
  2. The conjugate of an expression is the same expression with the sign reversed. [4] For example, the conjugate of is
    • Why does the conjugate work? Going back to our arbitrary fraction multiplying by the conjugate in the numerator and denominator results in the denominator being The key here is that there are no cross-terms. Since both of these terms are being squared, any square roots will be eliminated.
  3. [5]
  4. Advertisement
Part 3
Part 3 of 4:

Working with Reciprocals

PDF download Download Article
  1. If you are asked to write the reciprocal of a set of terms containing a radical, you will need to rationalize before simplifying. Use the method for monomial or binomial denominators, depending on whichever applies to the problem. [6]
  2. A reciprocal is created when you invert the fraction. [7] Our expression is actually a fraction. It's just being divided by 1.
  3. Remember, you're actually multiplying by 1, so you have to multiply both the numerator and denominator. Our example is a binomial, so multiply the top and bottom by the conjugate. [8]
    • Do not be thrown off by the fact that the reciprocal is the conjugate. This is just a coincidence.
  4. Advertisement
Part 4
Part 4 of 4:

Rationalizing Denominators with a Cube Root

PDF download Download Article
  1. You can also expect to face cube roots in the denominator at some point, though they are rarer. This method also generalizes to roots of any index. [9]
  2. Finding an expression that will rationalize the denominator here will be a bit different because we cannot simply multiply by the radical. [10]
  3. In our case, we are dealing with a cube root, so multiply by Remember that exponents turn a multiplication problem into an addition problem by the property [11]
    • This can generalize to nth roots in the denominator. If we have we multiply the top and bottom by This will make the exponent in the denominator 1.
  4. [12]
    • If you need to write it in radical form, factor out the
  5. Advertisement


Community Q&A

Search
Add New Question
  • Question
    How do I rationalize with three terms?
    Community Answer
    Something like 1/(1+root2 + root3)? If so, group as 1+(root2 + root3) and multiply through by the "difference of squares conjugate" 1-(root2 + root3). That makes the denominator -4 - root6, which is still irrational, but did improve from two irrational terms to only one. So repeat the same trick by multiplying through by -4+root6 and the denominator is rationalized.
  • Question
    In your pictures, what does the point mean?
    Donagan
    Top Answerer
    If you're asking about the dots that are placed between various fractions, those are multiplication signs. For example, in the article's second image we see (7√3) / (2√7), then a dot, then (√7 / √7). That means we multiply the first fraction by the second fraction (numerator times numerator, and denominator times denominator), giving us (7√21) / 14, which simplifies to √21 / 2. (Incidentally, the article shows some other dots that are not between fractions. Those are merely "bullet points.")
  • Question
    How can I rationalize the denominator with a cube root that has a variable?
    Community Answer
    If it is a binomial expression, follow the steps outlined in method 2.
See more answers
Ask a Question
      Advertisement

      Tips

      Submit a Tip
      All tip submissions are carefully reviewed before being published
      Name
      Please provide your name and last initial
      Thanks for submitting a tip for review!

      About This Article

      Article Summary X

      To rationalize a denominator, start by multiplying the numerator and denominator by the radical in the denominator. Then, simplify the fraction if necessary. If you're working with a fraction that has a binomial denominator, or two terms in the denominator, multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator. To get the conjugate, just reverse the sign in the expression. Then, simplify your answer as needed. To learn how to rationalize a denominator with a cube root, scroll down!

      Did this summary help you?
      Thanks to all authors for creating a page that has been read 124,794 times.

      Did this article help you?

      Advertisement