Hey many time I see that intro image of FA is removed by someone. Are those image not checked first before selecting it as FA? Because during QG, the intro image is removed and FA, which most people read, has no intro image. So I think it’ll be better for FA if we first review an intro image in QG and then publish it. What you all think, comment please.

@IamSH can you think of an example where this has happened? I haven’t seen it happening, but I could be missing something.

@AndrewG199 Click here to see what I got recently.

Well that’s strange, considering I hit yes for that picture…

:\ Unfortunately it is was a ‘no’ and the other no from the previous day made it removed. I reverted it back so the image is there now.

I meant to hit ‘yes’, I guess my mouse must have slipped or something. Oops. I’ll try to be more careful next time.

Hey @AndrewG1999 , don’t worry about that thing. It might happened mistakenly. Here in this thread we are discussing about FA intro image in QG.

It seems rare that an image is removed from an FA by QG. The article is reviewed before it is actually featured so it’s unlikely that people will say the image was inappropriate. In this case it seems to have been an innocent mistake. If it starts happening more often, please let me know. In the meantime, @IamSH thank you for double checking when an image is removed through QG while you are patrolling. I’m glad you are such a thorough patroller!