1

Fortunately, I ‘watch’ my articles. There are times when there really ISN’T a ‘perfect match’ for an article. That doesn’t mean that the one that was chosen is detrimental. When people are voting whether or not an article is an ‘exact match’, they should consider whether or not there can BE an exact match. Also, I have had ‘perfect matches’ removed as well. Not really expecting anything to be done about this, so much as just wanting to bring it up.

2

Ahhhh…I love going around removing your images…I thought you were talking about removing your userpage image, that is one of the things I come to wikiHow to see every morning. Seriously, an intro image added by an original author should have a little more durability than one added with the image adder tool or by someone else, since the orginal author should have a more precise vision of the content and the needs of the article. The QG tools, including the image tool are not perfect, but I like to actually see an image that is removed, and with the special RC, you don’t, you only see the current revision, so I often look at the history to see what has been taken off, and if the image is suited to the content, I will revert the edit that removes it. Is there an easy way for someone with a slow internet connection to review the previous edit without having to open it in a new tab?

3

Well, a lot of the authors who use QG probably won’t see this thread, unless there was an article on it.