*Edited to include articles that would go under the new categories. This is **PART 1** that encompasses math articles.

Hello everyone,

I’ve made a goal to revamp these two categories now that Latex is running smoothly again (the code that gives you beautiful-looking equations). While browsing through these categories, I noticed a lot of articles were miscategorized, could be better placed in more specific categories, or would benefit from new ones. So here are my suggestions.


Within the category of Mathematics:

Economics:

Take it out of Mathematics and put it in its own category within Subjects. Although economics uses math, so do countless other applications, and it’s a form of social science anyway.

Algebra: create subcategory

*Linear algebra 

https://www.wikihow.com/Solve-a-System-of-Two-Linear-Equations

https://www.wikihow.com/Use-Inverse-Matrices-to-Solve-Systems-of-Equations

https://www.wikihow.com/Find-the-Inverse-of-a-Matrix

I suggest this because linear algebra (matrix algebra) is an extremely broad discipline of its own. There are many articles that solve systems of linear equations, matrix operations, etc. that would belong here very well. 

There are many, many other types of algebra out there, but linear is probably the most accessible. This may suffer from miscategorization, as the “linear” in linear algebra does not actually refer to linear equations (although the discipline does deal with them), but I believe this to be a minor tradeoff.

(I was considering the category “elementary algebra” as well to encompass algebra learned in middle and high school, but who wants to type out all that just for something most of us already understand under the name “algebra” anyway?)

Calculus: create subcategories

*Differentiation

https://www.wikihow.com/Partially-Differentiate-a-Polynomial-With-the-Chain-Rule

*Integration

https://www.wikihow.com/Integrate-by-Parts-when-One-Function-Is-a-Polynomial

https://www.wikihow.com/Integrate-Lnx

https://www.wikihow.com/Integrate-by-Substitution

These speaks for themselves. These are the main branches of calculus. Other topics, such as limits, differential equations, etc. go in the broader Calculus category.

Addition and Subtraction, Multiplication, Division, Exponents: create broader category

*Arithmetic

Within this category, create subcategories:

*Addition and Subtraction

*Multiplication and Division

*Exponents and Logarithms

I say this because these are all simply arithmetic operations. Exponents does not make any reference to logarithms, its inverse, which I believe to be a mistake (every article that goes under Exponents right now goes under here too). Division is the inverse of multiplication. Modular arithmetic can also be located under this as well.

Geometry: create subcategory

*Vectors

I really don’t like the “coordinate geometry” category. It’s too vague. A lot of the articles in there are miscategorized, and I think a proper categorization in the future would get rid of this altogether, while articles in it would be better placed. Trigonometry and coordinate geometry have many overlaps. I reluctantly recategorized vector articles under here, but creating a separate vectors section would, in my opinion, be more beneficial.

I also suggest shortening “calculating volume and area” to simply “volume and area.”

Create category:

Sequences and Series

https://www.wikihow.com/Find-the-Sum-of-a-Geometric-Sequence

I started having a look around here, with a focus on the larger potential categories (see here for reasoning about why - for now, at least). 

Looking at the big 'uns to start with, I got the Arithmetic and Addition/Subtraction and Multiplication/Division ones up and running. I also swapped out “Exponents” to “Exponents and Logarithms” but I did a bit of poking around some other sites and found that they generally stick the whole category under Algebra - Khan Academy, Math is Fun, Wyzant, Purple Math, etc. It’s been a long time since I took any math, so I might be misremembering, but would it make sense to follow suit there, if that’s what readers would expect? I’ve put it under Algebra for now, but it’ll be easy enough to move it if there’s a reason to have it under Arithmetic or elsewhere.

One thing I keep thinking re: categories in general is that sometimes it might benefit readers not to go into the complete and total nitty gritty of specificity/detail in the category tree, because folks browsing around for topics they don’t know about (ie how-to topics) don’t necessarily know what they’re looking for.  That might be worth us noodling on as we move forward - how we can find the sweet spot for staying organized  while also letting people browse in not-too-specific topic areas, without having to click through to subcategories whose names might not call their attention if they don’t already know the topics inside and out. It’s a tricky balance to hit, I think, so it might take some trial and error!

>It’s been a long time since I took any math, so I might be misremembering, but would it make sense to follow suit there, if that’s what readers would expect? I’ve put it under Algebra for now, but it’ll be easy enough to move it if there’s a reason to have it under Arithmetic or elsewhere.

Yea, my bad - exponents/logs should be under algebra. Great catch!

>One thing I keep thinking re: categories in general is that sometimes it might benefit readers not to go into the complete and total nitty gritty of specificity/detail in the category tree, because folks browsing around for topics they don’t know about (ie how-to topics) don’t necessarily know what they’re looking for.

I tend to agree with this as well - it doesn’t make sense to needlessly expand the category tree. I can see how that relates with differentiation, integration, etc. But I think that a lot of the cat suggestions in this thread are based on the idea that these are pretty broad topics in math that have a vast potential to fill - that is, the categories are unsaturated. For example, there’s only 6 article suggestions for vectors right now, but I can tell you that dealing with vectors makes up an incredibly broad scope of math - perhaps 10 years from now, there’ll be at least 100 articles on it alone. Ditto with linear algebra.

Personally, when I was browsing through the math category, I was encountering articles of all kinds, and I found it a bit difficult to edit articles of similar topics.

Oh yeah, I hear you on potential - it’d be great to get those categories filled out! And I’m stoked you’re tackling a lot of them:slight_smile:

I’m pretty new to the category creation game, but my understanding from studying up (mostly, studying tons of good background info provided to me by Felicity, who along with Mal and others tended the tree for many years) is that they’ve found it be best practice to wait until the articles existed to make the new category, though. In the past, that threshold was somewhat arbitrarily set at 5 articles - but that was a stage when we had way fewer topics and categories in general. Now that we’ve grown so much, it seems like it’s a practice that’s expanding the tree outwards without actually resulting in all of those categories actually getting filled with great content. Maybe we just keep watching as these subdivisions grow and then start the subcats once there are say 25, 30 articles to fill them? My hunch is this would be a much better user experience than having the “aha” moment as you browse around… but clicking into a category to find it only has like 6 or 7 articles just yet. And at the rate you’re going on some of these artice creations, it might not even take very long, hah!

If we’re in an interim phase here, are there any other ways we could go about organizing the Math and the Physics categories that would make sense to you (feel free to post on the Physics thread, if you have ideas on that one)? For example, until we get to the point of those potentially specific but vast categories containing more titles, are there parts of the remaining requests that have enough topics to do now, or a broader subcat that could catch several of these areas at once, until there are enough topics to subdivide them?

Most of my work on using math to create art is categorizable as “Microsoft Excel Imagery” or Trigonometry (which cat I’m not sure if exists yet or not?) …