(trigger warning for ABA, torture, and suicide)

I’ve been sharing a lot of WikiHow autism articles with tumblr’s Autistic community, with pretty positive responses. (They love our stuff!) Unfortunately, I was just informed of an access barrier: our autism articles have ABA ads on them.

Autistic people look out for each other. When discussing this stuff in our community, we mark trigger warnings and tell sensitive people to stay far, far away from mentions of it.

I want WikiHow’s autism articles to be accessible to all autistic people, including the ones who have PTSD, remember being abused, or get really squeamish about abuse and torture. Here are a few options I could see going forward:

  • Figure out how to remove ABA ads from the autism articles; replace them with other ads like for therapies that haven’t scarred so many people (e.g. sensory integration, RDI, Floortime; I haven’t heard abuse stories from any of these), or other autism- and disability-related ads (independent living, job search, depression meds, parenting disabled kids, etc.).
  • Show ads not specific to autism at all, just random stuff like “floor-cleaning product!” and “waterproof makeup!”
  • Not show ads on autism articles at all.
  • Do nothing and leave the upsetting ads. Whenever I share a wikiHow article, I could add a warning about triggering ads and encourage everyone to install an ad blocker first. I know that wikiHow makes revenue from ads, so I’d rather not do this, because it’d lose us money.

What is possible and realistic? How can we make WikiHow accessible to everyone?

Just want to say thanks for bringing this to attention. I don’t know how much control the site managers have over this, but if the ads have a report button people could try reporting it as inappropriate or something.  This may not have a fast effect, but its just something I thought of. Usually reporting an ad of covering your screen, makes it go away. 

For the most part, the ad system works on its own - nobody at the wikiHaus picks the ads that go up, one by one. Rather, the system uses an ad provider that matches ads to the page through some kind of automated process. I don’t know much about it, but I gather that’s how nearly all internet advertising works (except on sites that employ a large sales force for their ad space).

I did some surfing around and saw a big range on autism articles: some, like you mentioned, for unrelated general products/services (like printing to PDF or college programs), some for aquatic therapy and sensory rooms, etc. I didn’t happen to see any ABA ones but I believe you that they’re out there.

I really sympathize with the folks who’ve had bad ABA experiences. When I worked in that field, I had the benefit of working for an organization that incorporated some ABA techniques in a natural and supportive way, focused on building coping mechanisms and communication, rather than changing who our clients were. However, at my school sites, I did see a lot of folks from other organizations following protocols that I’m sure were more difficult and upsetting and could have led to the kind of PTSD you’re talking about. I even have mixed feelings when people ask about my past in that field, because I don’t like being associated with some of those organizations, even though the one I worked for did things differently:frowning:

I would say, though, that it’s not a totally 100% clear cut issue, when it comes to deciding if those organizations and therapies as a whole are good or bad. ABA is still a very common therapy and recommended by many health providers and school districts and so on. I’m not saying that’s necessarily a good thing in itself, since there are some providers who don’t do the therapy very well… but I’m not sure it’s in our realm to decide what therapy programs are worthwhile and which ones are unhelpful. It does seem like a good reason to fight for reform and better policies/approaches/recommendations in the industry and education/disability services field as a whole, though!

Any kind of therapy or program can be done well or not well, so it’d be tough to blacklist the ads of one particular kind of business (and my guess is not technically feasible the way the ad network works).  I do know, though, that many ad providers offer a flagging system - I’ve seen that on at least some of our ads. If you feel a particular ad violates their policies or isn’t in readers’ best interests, maybe you can hit that x on the side and flag it for them?  That would probably help the ad providers (on any site for that matter, not just this one) figure out what it’s helpful for folks to see and not see on those topics. Hopefully they can boot some of the bad organizations from there. If you want to send me any screenshots via email, too, I’d be happy to take a look and flag as well, so that’s two votes going to the ad provider, at least:slight_smile:

Another idea you can throw out to folks when you share the articles is that if they create an account  or log in, that’ll make ads go away. If they stay logged in on their browser, they’ll be able to avoid ads altogether – and maybe even be inspired to chip in with your super editing efforts!

As @Anna indicated, creating a wikiHow account, then faithfully logging in is a great solution. 

Also, a member of the haus might be able to supply PDFs to someone in the community which could then be shared directly. This is not optimal and the other solution is probably better for everyone.