This article was co-authored by Chelsea Hunersen
and by wikiHow staff writer, Cory Stillman
. Chelsea Hunersen is a Social Media Expert and leads the Social Media team at Qualtrics in the Greater Salt Lake City Area. With over 10 years of experience, she specializes in social media and content development. She has been published in TheMuse, The HubSpot Blog, and HuffPost. She earned her MS in Integrated Marketing Communications from Northwestern University and her BA from the University of Michigan. She also holds a HubSpot Inbound Marketing Certification.
This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources.
This article has been viewed 23,387 times.
From 2013 to 2017, Vine was one of the most popular apps in America. So why did it shut down so suddenly? Vine's six-second looping videos may seem similar to TikToks, but there are a few key differences that led to Vine's rapid downfall. This wikiHow article covers everything you want to know about the disappearance of Vine.
Things You Should Know
- As new competitors emerged, Vine refused to evolve beyond its core six-second looping video format.
- Vine struggled to create opportunities for monetization, causing users to leave for other apps.
- Vine's parent company Twitter shut down Vine in January of 2017.
Steps
-
Faced with opposition, Vine remained committed to its six-second looping videos. Although Vine's unique time constraints facilitated creativity amongst its community and launched the app to stardom, there remained a lot of interest in new short-form video formats. The company refused to consider alternatives to its core model and suffered as a result.
-
Competitive apps like Instagram and TikTok introduced longer video formats. Instagram was the first Vine competitor to allow its users to record up to fifteen seconds of video, and TikTok soon followed with the approach that has since taken social media by storm.
- Facebook even banned all Vine content from its platform in an attempt to prioritize its own video content.
-
After its initial growth spurt, Vine struggled to create opportunities for monetization. Creators on Vine monetized their content primarily through third-party sponsorships, but Vine failed to implement additional opportunities for creators to make money.
- Vine similarly struggled to create opportunities for its own monetization. Despite an influx of money from its early growth, Vine never managed to make money thereafter (outside of residuals from creators' external partnerships) and was left with little reason to keep the company running.
-
Iconic Vine creators like Shawn Mendes, Lele Pons, and the Paul brothers gathered to demand money from Vine. A group of 18 creators banded together to request $1.2 million each from Vine in exchange for them to post 12 Vines a month. Because Vine could not afford this kind of payout, these creators left Vine for other apps, driving away billions of monthly views.
-
Twitter introduced its own video feature shortly after acquiring Vine. Twitter acquired Vine in 2012 (before Vine even launched) to incorporate its video tools into its own app. [1] X Research source The parent company soon saw an opportunity to expand its video presence, and use Vine to prop up the Twitter brand, crowding out Vine in the process.
- Despite its popularity, Twitter has never been a very profitable business itself. Supporting Vine, therefore, became an unaffordable expense. The company shut Vine down in January of 2017.
-
Two of Vine's top executives left in 2014. Even with the company experiencing arguably its best year, general manager Dom Hoffman stepped down in January of 2014. His replacement, Colin Kroll, stepped away after just three months in the role. The last remaining member of the original leadership group, Rus Yusupov, was laid off after Twitter restructured the company in 2015.